Empirical structure
Does it correspond? Rank, topology, SFR, density — with nulls.
The project is not “elliptic curves determine the universe.” It asks whether arithmetic invariants can be mapped into geometric and topological structures that produce statistically nontrivial, reproducible correspondence with independent astronomical data.
Can arithmetic invariants be mapped into geometric or topological structures that correspond nontrivially to independently observed cosmic structure?
Can those invariants become scalar or vector fields whose geometry can be compared with matter, lensing, or radiation — without assuming they are gravity?
Does rank, alone or with other invariants, predict clusters, filaments, voids, or web complexity better than shuffled and alternative controls?
Can an arithmetic family indexed by τ reproduce features of cosmic topology as a function of redshift, without identifying τ with z or rank with time?
If robust correspondence exists, can it be expressed as a consistent variational theory that recovers known limits? RTCH is a candidate, not a replacement for Einstein gravity.
Does it correspond? Rank, topology, SFR, density — with nulls.
Build h_arith and F_arith as mathematics first. Compare to fields later.
RTCH, ECC, and H₀ are downstream of independent correspondence.
Do not ask whether the theory can be made to fit the universe. Ask whether a fixed mathematical construction predicts structure that was not used to construct it.